Punching Stupid and Evil in the Face Since 1986!

"We are on strike, we the men of the mind. We are on strike against self-immolation. We are on strike against the creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties."-John Galt

Friday, November 5, 2010

Activist L.A. Superior Court Judge, Peter Espinoza, Says Pedophiles Can Live Near Schools, Parks

The latest in a series of bad rulings, favoring the rights of pedophiles over the rights of children, L.A. Superior Court Judge, Peter Espinoza now says the California residency requirements on sex offenders forces pedophiles to "choose between prison and homelessness." It is his opinion that "Jessica's Law" passed by voters by an overwhelming majority in 2006, places an undue burden on the sex offenders.
"The evidence presented suggests that despite lay belief, a sex offender parolee's residential proximity to a school or park where children regularly gather does not bear on the parolee's likelihood to commit a sexual offense against a child," the judge, who supervises the county’s criminal courts, wrote in his order. He also wrote that an increase in homeless sex offenders—supposedly an outcome of the law—would risk public safety."

It should come as no surprise, this is the same Judge who ruled that Roman Polanski was a victim of judicial misconduct by watching a documentary on cable.
He also ordered a man convicted in the execution-style slaying of a high school classmate be released. Due to the gruesome nature of the crime, the governor overturned the murderer’s parole because it would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to society. Espinoza ordered the release anyway.
Activist Judges must be stopped. The continual over-turning of the will of the people-imposing perfectly legal remedies on offenders through the voting process-cannot continue. The protection of the criminal over the victim cannot continue. We must find a way to rid ourselves of those Judges who want to only bastardize the legal process and manipulate the Constitution to suit the criminal offenders.

13 comments:

  1. Sounds like Judge Espinoza may have some illegal curricular activity of his own going on. Why else would he be so sympathetic to these offenders?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe and hope that something is done in revising Jessica's Law. There are many prisoners convicted and serving time for breaking the law, by having a consensual relationship (most of the time is with only one person) a minor. And in a lot of cases parents have some knowledge or suspect of the relationship. I agree that the individual broke the law and must receive and serve time, BUT you can not treat a person convicted of statutory rape the same way it treats repeat CHILD molesters. If in the case of murder, the law break down the conviction into first degree, second degree, etc. Why can Jessica' law be done in the same way? Something has to be change and soon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. KEEP HIM IN CALIFORNIA AND MOVE ALL THE CHILDREN TO ANOTHER STATE. This incompetent un=human judge should be removed from the court system immediately AND THE CITIZENS SHOULD DILIGENTLY RESEARCH HIS QUALIFICATIONS AND BACKGROUND!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Espinoza has been sponging off the tax payers long enough. Through him and that silly bow tie out!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Peter Paul Espinoza is one of the many vermin who sponge off the earnings of others through taxes.
    He is an example of "The parasite has become larger than the host". He needs to go.
    And by the way the bow ties look absolutely ridiculous - Pete Sr. would be embarrassed !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jessica and Megan would be appalled at the way the State of California handled their deaths. The label of "sex offender" is so broad (from peeing in public to the worst of the worst) that each person (and yes, they are PEOPLE) should be evaluated on an individual basis. Let's start believing in our own system of "rehabilitation". Let prison do it's job and stop parole from acting as God!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think that the people leaving angry post's should educate themselves on this topic. Anger only creates more issues ! EDUCATE YOURSELF

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yoda, you are entitled to your opinion. I see no angry post's. I see comments and opinions. As harsh as they may seem they are just that, comments and opinions.
    Who made you the "Gate Keeper"?

    ReplyDelete
  9. It is time to look at all desperate unreasnoble laws that CA creates.
    Lots of people are in jail because of false ecused. The amount of prisoners in the US and CA can compeat with Russia Stalin.
    How could be that a ladys word is the evidance.
    This is as bad as the stoning laws of Islam. no difrence both are equal. in Islam the word of a man is the evidence. In US CA the word of teen age is the word and can put any man in prison.
    Regardles of the evidance.
    A teen ager can come to A 20 year old man, lie about her age, 2 month later she can decide to ecuse any one on anything. The jury will always go with the DA. The guy will be in prison, no Dna nothing her word is the evidance. The only way out is plea bargain 3 years.
    Is this justice?
    Wake up America. We are as bad as Iran here the woman is always right, there the man has ALL THE RIGHTS. NO DIFERENCE, no justice.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Move to Iran FOOL !

    ReplyDelete
  11. If you would actually do some research before posting articles that arent correct, you would see that those convicted of pc 288, which deals with children and such still have the restriction placed upon them. But dont let fact stand in the way of a good story I guess

    ReplyDelete
  12. I say they did their time like everyone eles let them go home. Why do you keep punishing them. Do you do this to a convicted murderer?? No you dont. They can go home and live close to schools and parks even if the killed a child. So why dont you go after the murderers like you are the sex offenders? You need to look at the whole picture. Some where at partys all ages and these darn girls the way they dress and believe me the parents dont care how they dress but they look like they are in their twentys and then lie about thier ages etc. and who goes to jail the guy and nothing happens to these girls. I am for sex offenders going home and be able to prove they are not all bad. Some urinated out side, or a girl said something not true, or the parents said to thier daughter yes you can date a 19 yr old but oh oh she got pregnant now less scream rape. These girls know the system and know how to work it. My heart goes out to alot of these guys who got hung out to dry. Let them go home!! Before you rag on these guys and hang them try being open minded and look at the whole picture before passing judgement. Remember this could happen to you or your husband, son, father etc.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AFTER READING ALL THIS POST I SEE THAT THIS LAW IS VERY WRONG . THEY ARE MANY MEN THAT ARE ACCUSE OF RAPE THAT DIDN'T DO IT . EVEN IF THEY DIDN'T DO IT THEY ARE STILL CONVICTED AND EMBARRASSED WITH THIS SHAMEFUL CRIME .WHAT THIS DOES IS DESTROYED NOT ONLY THEIR LIFE BUT THEIR FAMILIES AS WELL. DO U KNOW THAT NO MATTER IF THIS PEOPLE GET OUT THEY CANT EVER GET A JOB N PROVIDED FOR THEIR FAMILIES OR IF THEY HAVE KIDS EVER SEE THEM GROW TILL THE KID TURN 20 . I DO BELIEVE THAT RAPES SHOULD BE PUNISH BUT Y WOULD WE SOMEONE WORD WITH OUT PROVE OR EVIDENCE.?

    ReplyDelete